Inconsistency · I-E-18

GIMBAL: a cold object or a very hot one?

Luis Elizondo

Weight: Minor or formal

First version

Aug 20, 2024 · On page 146 of Imminent the object in the GIMBAL video is described as cold. Metabunk (Mick West) – “Errors in Imminent”, August 23, 2024

Second version

Aug 20, 2024 · On page 150 of the same book the same object is described as very hot. Metabunk (Mick West) – “Errors in Imminent”, August 23, 2024

Analysis

It is an inconsistency internal to the text, pointed out by Mick West, who considers the object hot for the entire duration of the video; it could be an editorial oversight or a reference to different phases of the observation, but the book does not clarify this.

Sources

1. Metabunk (Mick West) – “Errors in Imminent”, August 23, 2024 (analysis, skeptical)
2. Metabunk (Mick West) – “Errors in Imminent”, August 23, 2024 (analysis, skeptical)

On this site

People 1

• Luis Elizondo

Claims 1

• Luis Elizondo: Writes that the halo around the object in the GIMBAL video was not a camera artifact or a reflection, that… Disputed

Cases 1

• GIMBAL video: object filmed in infrared by an F/A-18 off Florida Unexplained

Open in the interactive archive The whole section: Inconsistencies

UAPgrade's entries are compiled with artificial intelligence (three verifiers with opposing roles) and checked against the sources listed above: how we work. Have a document that changes this entry? Bring it to the Investigations Unit.