UAPgradeUAPgrade Italiano

Official position · S-008

The formal investigation opened in December 2017 into Elizondo's possible improper use of classified material closed with the conclusion that the released videos were not classified; AFOSI noted, however, that the release authority would not have approved their release to the media had it been informed.

AFOSI (Air Force Office of Special Investigations) · Apr 13, 2018

Sightings, video, sensors

What it denies and what it leaves open

It rules out a disclosure of classified material; it does not confirm that the videos were authorized for public release and does not rule on Elizondo's role in AATIP.

Original words
would not have approved
Who disputes it
Elizondo cites the closing of the investigation as proof that he committed no unauthorized disclosure and maintains that it was the Department of Defense that released the videos.

Sources

  1. Garry Reid's memorandum for the record, December 2017 (FOIA release 22-F-1322, PDF) (primary source)
  2. FOIA release from the DoD Inspector General DODIG-2022-000313 (PDF) (primary source)
  3. The Debrief, April 14, 2022 (press, pro-disclosure)
  4. The Black Vault, June 23, 2023: the Pentagon memos on Elizondo (analysis)

On this site

People 1

Documents 1

Open in the interactive archive The whole section: Denials and official positions

UAPgrade's entries are compiled with artificial intelligence (three verifiers with opposing roles) and checked against the sources listed above: how we work. Have a document that changes this entry? Bring it to the Investigations Unit.