UAPgradeUAPgrade Italiano

Claim · E-019

Luis Elizondo: Claims that the AFOSI investigation into the release of the three videos found no unauthorized disclosure on his part and that, despite this favorable outcome, in April 2021 the security agency DCSA asked him for a new interview in order to keep his clearance, accusing him of having released the videos without authorization.

Luis Elizondo · May 3, 2021 · Complaint to the DoD Office of Inspector General (May 3, 2021) (Document)

Based on documents Complaints and legal process

Partly verified

AFOSI closed the case in April 2018, determining that the videos were not classified, but also noted that release to the media would not have been approved had the competent authority been informed.

Original words
there were no findings of me conducting any kind of Unauthorized Disclosure
In support
According to the released memoranda (Black Vault, 2023), AFOSI concluded in April 2018 (on April 13 according to The Debrief) that the videos were not classified and closed the matter.
Against or denials
The same AFOSI noted that the release authority would not have approved release to the media had it been informed; the DCSA request is known only from Elizondo's account.

Sources

  1. DoD Office of Inspector General, FOIA release DODIG-2022-000313 (with the 2017 resignation letter and a copy of the Politico article of May 26, 2021) (primary source)
  2. The Black Vault – the Pentagon memoranda on Elizondo (resignation, AFOSI, videos), June 23, 2023 (analysis)
  3. The Debrief – the alleged removal of Garry Reid, April 14, 2022 (press, pro-disclosure)

On this site

People 1

Claims 2

Inconsistencies 2

Documents 1

Open in the interactive archive The whole section: Claims

UAPgrade's entries are compiled with artificial intelligence (three verifiers with opposing roles) and checked against the sources listed above: how we work. Have a document that changes this entry? Bring it to the Investigations Unit.