Official position · S-039
The closeout report of the agreement with TTSA, made public through FOIA, judges “Artifact A1” to be probably a test object or a manufacturing product or by-product, without military or ground vehicle applications; ORNL describes it as a layered alloy of magnesium, zinc and bismuth probably obtained with commercial techniques.
U.S. Army (Ground Vehicle Systems Center) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory · May 29, 2025
Materials and metamaterials
What it denies and what it leaves open
It concerns the sample examined under the agreement; it does not evaluate other materials that TTSA says it analyzed in its ADAM program.
- Original words
no military or ground vehicle application
- Who disputes it
- TTSA had presented the materials as not attributable to known military or commercial applications; it has not, however, published its own technical data in support.
- Concerns
- Steve Justice, Tom DeLonge, Luis Elizondo
Sources
- The War Zone, October 18, 2019 (press)
- The Black Vault, May 29, 2025: what the military now says about TTSA's material (analysis)
On this site
People 3
Documents 1
- The closing report of the agreement between the Army and TTSA on the “A1” material Original available
Open in the interactive archive The whole section: Denials and official positions
UAPgrade's entries are compiled with artificial intelligence (three verifiers with opposing roles) and checked against the sources listed above: how we work. Have a document that changes this entry? Bring it to the Investigations Unit.