UAPgradeUAPgrade Italiano

Inconsistency · I-E-11

The approach to Mattis: aerospace threats or transfer of material?

Luis Elizondo

Weight: Substantial

First version
Oct 4, 2017 · In the resignation letter addressed to the Secretary of Defense he speaks only of anomalous aerospace threats and invites him to ask the difficult questions (who else knows, what capabilities they have, why more is not being invested), with no references to recovered materials. DoD Office of Inspector General, FOIA release DODIG-2022-000313 (with the 2017 resignation letter and a copy of the Politico article of May 26, 2021)
Second version
Nov 13, 2024 · Under oath he recounts that, as the memorandum from the Secretary of the Air Force needed to transfer to Bigelow the material collected in the 1950s was missing, he tried to obtain a memorandum from Mattis when Mattis became Secretary of Defense. Transcript of the hearing “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth”, House of Representatives, November 13, 2024
Analysis
An unclassified resignation letter was not the place to cite material covered by secrecy, and Elizondo claims to be bound by confidentiality obligations; the book, which went through DOPSR review, mentions only the rejection of his request for a briefing to Mattis. It remains that the most recent reconstruction shifts the meaning of the approach to Mattis from the assessment of a threat to the custody of recovered material, an element that does not appear in the 2017 documents.

Sources

  1. DoD Office of Inspector General, FOIA release DODIG-2022-000313 (with the 2017 resignation letter and a copy of the Politico article of May 26, 2021) (primary source)
  2. Transcript of the hearing “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth”, House of Representatives, November 13, 2024 (primary source)

On this site

People 1

Claims 2

Documents 1

Where the claims come from 1

Open in the interactive archive The whole section: Inconsistencies

UAPgrade's entries are compiled with artificial intelligence (three verifiers with opposing roles) and checked against the sources listed above: how we work. Have a document that changes this entry? Bring it to the Investigations Unit.