UAPgradeUAPgrade Italiano

Claim origin · GN-09

Those involved in the programs or who speak about them have suffered threats, retaliation, violence and even murder plots.

Cannot be determined

First attestation
May 26, 2021 · Luis Elizondo, Complaint to the DoD Office of Inspector General (May 3, 2021), made public by Politico on May 26, 2021. Reports retaliation and explicit threats from senior Pentagon officials, whom Politico does not name; recounts that, after he left the government, a senior official warned him that he would tell people he was crazy, with possible consequences for his clearance. First documented attestation in the sources consulted; at this stage the threats concern reputation and clearance, not physical safety.
Who picked it up
  1. Jul 26, 2023 · David Grusch: Under oath he says he personally knows people who were harmed or injured in the efforts to hide the technology; on the possibility of murders he says he must be careful and that he has referred those with knowledge to the authorities; he describes the retaliation he suffered as very brutal. Direct knowledge (source given: Personal experience and that of unnamed colleagues)
  2. Mar 8, 2024 · anonymous AARO interviewees: Some interviewees maintain, based on hearsay, that nondisclosure agreements on the reverse-engineering program provided for punishment by death; AARO found no agreements of this kind beyond the penalties provided by law. Hearsay (source given: Second- and third-hand accounts)
  3. Nov 13, 2024 · Luis Elizondo: Under oath he states that he and many former colleagues were targeted with “threats to our careers, our security clearances, and even our lives”; in the written answers he speaks of surveillance, criminal investigations and death threats. Direct knowledge (source given: Personal experience and that of unnamed former colleagues)
  4. Sep 9, 2025 · George Knapp: In the written testimony he recounts that, after the 1989 news reports on Lazar, six people who had agreed to speak with him received intimidating visits the next day from government agents or from the security staff of their former employers, that a former contractor employee received veiled death threats and that one of his sources was warned to stop talking to him. Hearsay (source given: People he interviewed, mostly unnamed; the account is public in 2025, the date of the first version is not established)
  5. May 5, 2026 · David Grusch: Says that clearance revocations have hit his former superiors and collaborators and that some of them reported anomalous health incidents, receiving little help. Hearsay (source given: Experiences of unnamed collaborators)
  6. Sep 30, 2026 · David Grusch: On Joe Rogan's podcast he says that he and his wife received threats in early 2022 and that he learned, in a closed meeting with the Senate intelligence committee, that some officials wanted to kill him. Direct knowledge (source given: Personal experience and what Senate staff allegedly told him)
Analysis
The claims concern mainly the experiences of the speakers or of unnamed colleagues: they do not derive from an identifiable common source, but they have not been independently corroborated and the speakers vouch for one another (edges luis-elizondo → david-grusch “guarantor,” george-knapp → david-grusch “cites”), so AARO's circular reading can be neither confirmed nor ruled out. The available official checks point in another direction: the DoD Office of Inspector General in 2022 did not establish retaliation against Elizondo, the Pentagon in 2023 said it had no knowledge of people injured or killed for speaking with AARO, and AARO found no nondisclosure agreements with specific death threats; the ICIG's judgment that Grusch's complaint was credible and urgent concerns the procedure, not the merits. Over time Grusch's claims escalate, from what he described as administrative terrorism in 2023 to a plan to kill him in 2026 (I-G-09). The “Yankee Blue” case describes fictitious briefings in which anyone who revealed something was even threatened with execution: it is a documented mechanism from which similar accounts could arise, not proof that the threats reported are invented. Formal complaints, FBI investigative records, or a confirmation from Senate committees would be needed.

Sources

  1. DoD Office of Inspector General, FOIA release DODIG-2022-000313 (contains the Politico article of May 26, 2021 on Elizondo's complaint) (primary source)
  2. Official transcript of the July 26, 2023 House hearing (GovInfo, CHRG-118hhrg53022) (primary source)
  3. AARO, Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with UAP, Volume I (March 8, 2024) (primary source)
  4. Official transcript of the November 13, 2024 House hearing (GovInfo, CHRG-118hhrg57440) (primary source)
  5. Written answers by Luis Elizondo to Rep. Burlison's questions (December 19, 2024) (primary source)
  6. George Knapp, written testimony for the September 9, 2025 hearing (House Oversight Committee) (primary source, pro-disclosure)
  7. Stranger Than Fiction, summary of Grusch's interview on Judicial Watch's “On Watch” (May 6, 2026) (press, pro-disclosure)
  8. Shortform, summary of episode 2560 of The Joe Rogan Experience (September 30, 2026) (other)

On this site

People 3

Claims 10

Inconsistencies 4

Official positions 5

Documents 8

Timeline 6

Open in the interactive archive The whole section: Where the claims come from

UAPgrade's entries are compiled with artificial intelligence (three verifiers with opposing roles) and checked against the sources listed above: how we work. Have a document that changes this entry? Bring it to the Investigations Unit.